Tuesday, March 3, 2015

16 Bizarre, Surprising, Or Creepy Google Projects From Bloodstream Robots, Military Dogs, Lunar Bases, And Even Deodorant

from sanfrancisco.cbsnews.com

By Brandon Mercer

Google DNA Doodle (Google)

Google DNA Doodle (Google)


MOUNTAIN VIEW (CBS SF) — You get a text message on your Google phone from your blood-born Google nano sensors saying you need more vitamin D, so you turn off your Chromecast, turn on your Google connected home security system, pop in your Google anti-UV contact lenses, hop in your Google car to go to a beach that Google’s YouTube predicted you would like, then order up a burger and ice cream sundae to be delivered by Google drone, that you’ll eat with your Google Spoon, all coordinated using WiFi from Google balloons and satellites hovering above the Earth. Powered by Google’s Kite turbines. And you’ll do it all because Google’s Calico Lifespan project alerted you this morning that you have exactly 22 years, 5 months left of projected life left, and you want to enjoy every Google-connected minute of it.
Creepy?
Maybe.
Brilliant?
Yes.
Invasive?
Definitely.
Reality?
Every one of these is an actual project Google is investing time, money, and in some cases, entire divisions to make a reality.  Many already delivered on their initial goals.  Some of them Google has bought outright, and began improving on the technologies. Others are home grown.
Whichever way they came to be under the Google umbrella (or Google tentacles, depending on your view of massive corporations that explore diverse products), they show how Google is increasingly entrenched in every part of our lives.
It’s all public information, all available by–you guessed it: Googling it.
And, expect this list to grow.  Astro Teller (yes, that’s his real name) who runs the “moon shot” programs at Google X tells Forbes they reject 100 projects every year or more, including the Google Jetpack (too inefficient) and the Google Hoverboard (not practical).
16 GOOGLE PROJECTS THAT COULD CHANGE THE WORLD and CHANGE YOUR LIFE
1. GOOGLE “TERMINATOR”: This 6 foot, 2-inch tall, 330 pound robot named “Ian” is not really a killer, but it could be.  It looks like the Terminator, but its stated skills include carrying a fire hose, driving a car, and apparently doing moves from The Karate Kid. It’s a product of Boston Dynamics, a Google-owned subsidiary, that does contract work for DARPA, the U.S. Army, Navy, and Marine Corp in addition to private companies like Sony.
The same Google company has also developed a somewhat terrifying, 160-pound robotic “dog” that does not lick your hand and play fetch, but rather can carry military payloads into combat zones, while surviving swift kicks to the head. MORE: Robot Dog
2. GOOGLE CAR: Autonomous Vehicles (Without Steering Wheels!)
In as little as 24 months, Google believes its self-driving cars will be on public roads. The cars are already tooling around the Peninsula, and so far, the sensors and navigation seem to have no trouble stopping, turning, and sensing everything around them. Many test vehicles currently on public roads are normal cars retrofitted with the sensors, cameras and computers.  The newer cars, actually built by Google, are completely self-driving, and don’t even have a steering wheel.
Some futurists believe thousands of these cars could be in urban environments in just 10 years, radically altering traffic, the entire parking lot industry, and the entire concept of taxis, Uber, and car ownership. READ: How Uber’s Autonomous Cars Will Destroy 10 Million Jobs And Reshape The Economy by 2025
3. GOOGLE BOAT:  Yep, similar concept, only this one is at sea, and its focus is not moving humans but getting its cameras in place to map the shoreline and track rising sea levels. See it in action.
Google Trekker On The Water
Google is taking its Street View technology onto the water. (CBS)
4. GOOGLE PILL: “Nanoparticle Platform”
A  “pill” would unleash microscopic (nano-scale) particles into your bloodstream to sense heart disease, cancer and any other programmed conditions.  This Google X project marries magnetic material with proteins that can detect specific disease molecules, and then be “read” from outside the body using a wearable scanner like a watch, or your Google Android phone.
5. GOOGLE GENOMICS: “A Search Engine For Genes”
Part of Google Cloud, it’s software that stores the library of life. It gives developers an API to mine the entire genome — the DNA blueprint to create an organism —  and compare genetic traits and anomalies.  What you do with that data is up to you.  Google just provides the storage and processing power.
And yes, you could decode your genome, and upload yourself, or at least the code to make your clone.
6. GOOGLE LIFESPAN: “Calico” or “California Life Company” 
From Google itself: “Calico is a research and development company whose mission is to harness advanced technologies to increase our understanding of the biology that controls lifespan. We will use that knowledge to devise interventions that enable people to lead longer and healthier lives. Executing on this mission will require an unprecedented level of interdisciplinary effort and a long-term focus for which funding is already in place.”
7. GOOGLE DEODORANT? “Body Odor Solutions”
While this one may just be a fun patent Google picked up, because you know… it can, the company owns now the rights to a technology for a wearable device that senses your odor, and can release scents with a tiny fan. Additionally, because it’s Google, the device could connect to social networks to see where your friends are, and make sure you’re smelling your best if they come within a defined proximity, or help you plan a route to avoid them if you’re particularly foul smelling that day.  QZ was one of the first to report the bizarre patent.
8. GOOGLE CONTACT LENSES:
Novartis has already licensed the Google X lens technology for use in measuring glucose levels, saving diabetics from jabbing themselves with a needle to test blood multiple times a day. The lenses have an antenna and sensor array the size of a speck of glitter that transmit the information to a larger wearable device.  Just like the Google “Pill” concept, the lenses could also be used to test for breast, prostate, lung, and ovarian cancers because of proteins present in tears, and even deliver drugs, as reported by the MIT Technology Review.
google lens 16 Bizarre, Surprising, Or Creepy Google Projects From Bloodstream Robots, Military Dogs, Lunar Bases, And Even Deodorant
9. GOOGLE MAPPING… YOUR HOME, YOUR OFFICE, YOUR GARAGE: 
Project Tango is Google Streetview to the extreme.  We’ll let Google describe it in their own words:
What if you could capture the dimensions of your home simply by walking around with your phone before you went furniture shopping? What if directions to a new location didn’t stop at the street address? What if you never again found yourself lost in a new building? What if the visually-impaired could navigate unassisted in unfamiliar indoor places? What if you could search for a product and see where the exact shelf is located in a super-store?
Imagine playing hide-and-seek in your house with your favorite game character, or transforming the hallways into a tree-lined path. Imagine competing against a friend for control over territories in your home with your own miniature army, or hiding secret virtual treasures in physical places around the world?
10. GOOGLE DEEPMIND: Artificial Intelligence
Google is deeply involved in developing artificial intelligence.  (MORE: Google’s AI Lab) Besides letting you talk to your phone with natural language, Google really wants artificial intelligence to pore through massive databases, gleaning meaning from databases so vast, it would take humans millions of years to read them, let alone draw conclusions about the data. The DeepMindsoftware program uses AI techniques known as deep and reinforcement learning to take control of a real-world environment, according to a paper published in Nature.  Google tested it recently by letting it play Atari games to see if it could figure out what to do on its own.  It did.  Next, it might be unleashed on more beneficial tasks for society.
(Breakout/You Tube)
(Breakout/You Tube)
11. GOOGLE NEST: Home Security, And Then Some
The Nest project, also combined with Drop Cam after Google purchased the simple wireless security camera system, puts control and surveillance of your home under Google’s… I mean your control. <Re/Code> is quick to point out that Google keeps its name conspicuously absent from the national television ads for the system. Cute, destructive kids make for an amusing video advertisement for “A More Thoughtful Home”
Thermostats program themselves, smoke alarms alert you if something happens, and Drop Cams let you watch your cat nap (or eat your houseplants).
It’s much more ingrained in your life than you would think though, solving problems you didn’t know existed.
It shuts on and off devices based on electrical rates, or puts them in quiet mode when you’re in the house, and regular mode when you leave.  It knows where you are and adjusts your home temperature.  It ties into your phone and even your lights to alert or flash colors at you if something is wrong.
12. GOOGLE AIRBORNE DRONES:
For over two years, Google X labs has been working on Project Wing to deliver items by small remote controlled drone or “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle” (UAV), according to the first exclusive report last summer by The Atlantic. Tests have been going on Down Under, as Australia’s commercial drone rules are far more relaxed than in America where the Federal Aviation Administration bans most commercial flights.  An MIT roboticist on leave, and an Australian drone maker, Unmanned Systems Australia, are working on the small craft that lands on its tail like a helicopter, but can fly straight like a plane, and deliver packages on a little airborne winch.
13. GOOGLE BALLOON: “Project Loon”
When word first surfaced of this Internet in the Sky project, many thought it was a hoax, but Google really is “loony” enough to attempt Project Loon — circling the Earth with Internet-connected WiFi balloons, and making connectivity (and its search engine) available to everyone, everywhere.
In the “adorable” video voiced by a kid, Google points out that 2/3 of the world’s population cannot get online, and that means no online learning, no remote doctors, no weather data, and… again, no Google Search.
14. GOOGLE SPOON: Liftware
This may be the most obscure project a search engine and online advertising company could get involved with, but Google has perfected a spoon that people with Parkinson’s Disease can use to eat with.  It’s robotic, gyroscopic, and amazingly effective at restoring some of the dignity of being able to feed oneself back to patients with the tremor-inducing disease.
15. GOOGLE KITES:  “Wind Turbines, At High Altitude”
Google knows we need power to make its stuff work.  They have a solution for that.
They bought Makani, maker of wind turbines, and one product is a super-light, turbine system mounted on a kite, that can be flown where winds are extremely strong, and generate more power than they could closer to the ground.
It looks like a plane, but instead of using its propellers for power, it GENERATES power with them (once it gets into the air). The electricity travels back down the tether to a small ground station, giving the benefit of a turbine, without the giant spinning pinwheels.  And yes, they have video on YouTube showing a prototype already working.
16. GOOGLE MOON COMPUTERS:
Google needs extraordinary processing power.  As processors get smaller, the Holy Grail of computing is a quantum computer–actually using particles smaller than an atom– to do the processing and data storage. While current test models like the D-Wave can be anywhere from35,000 times faster, to 100 times slower than regular computers depending on the speed test, in the future quantum computing promises to do amazing things for storing more data than ever dreamed possible, and processing it.  The only drawback?
Quantum computers need temperatures colder than any freezer on Earth could ever reach. The solution?
As futurist and Databricks big data guru Paco Nathan described at a Galvanize University presentation in San Francisco’s SoMa, Google is likely researching a lunar base, where a quantum computer farm could be set up in a dark polar crater, where temperatures approach absolute zero, and quantum computing becomes possible, using laser beams to transmit data back and forth to Earth. His evidence of this big picture project? The Google Lunar X Prize already in competition by aerospace companies, and Google’s Quantum Computing plug-in module for Minecraft, to inspire the next generation of computer science / aerospace engineers / Googlers.
GOOGLE…. EVERYTHING:
The role of organizing the world’s information expands to anything that we use.  For this story, we searched “Google Light” and sure enough, Google developed a lightbulb, all controlled by an Android phone, using its protocol for connecting everything in the home (see above entry for Google Nest).
Google has the market capitalization, cash flow, and corporate culture to pour money into “moon shot” projects, and because it’s already finding mind-boggling success with concepts that were impossible, improbable, and laughable ten years ago–like the self-driving car–Google is encouraged to do more.
The question we as consumers need to keep asking is, should we and do we continue to trust Google with so much of our information?

Friday, February 27, 2015

The FCC on Net Neutrality: Be Careful What You Wish For

from pcmag





Net Neutrality
Yesterday's decision by the FCC to regulate Internet providers as common carriers is being hailed as a victory by most of the groups supporting net neutrality, and as a loss by the cable and telecommunications companies that will now be regulated. But as much as I back the concept of net neutrality – the idea that Internet providers shouldn't discriminate among content providers – I worry that we really don't know where these changes will lead to, and that there are likely to be unintended consequences that we can't predict.
The actual ruling, which came on a 3-2 partisan vote, classifies the Internet providers as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act, as opposed to an information service. The FCC has promised to "forebear" many of the regulatory powers it would have under that act, but it hasn't yet published the final ruling, so many of the details remain unknown.
The ruling follows years of debate about net neutrality. The concept seems obvious to me – if I subscribe to an Internet provider, I want to be able to get to all of the Internet content equally, at the speed I'm paying for. And while I understand the reason why some providers like the concept of "paid prioritization" – where services like Netflix pay an Internet provider such as Comcast extra to make sure their content gets delivered quickly - I can see how if this practice becomes commonplace, the Internet sites that can't afford to pay for this would be relegated to the "slow lane." The arguments by smaller firms such as Etsy that this would hurt their businesses and prevent new ones from being started make a lot of sense to me.
The FCC has tried to address this before, going back to Comcast's attempt to slow down connections to peer-to-peer sites such as BitTorrent. In 2010, the FCC passed rules that required transparency, no blocking, and no "unreasonable discrimination" in providing access to web sites. Verizon led an appeal of that ruling, and last January, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that the FCC didn't have the authority to impose those rules on services it hadn't classified as telecommunications service.
While the Internet providers took that as a win, yesterday's ruling reclassifying them so they can be more tightly regulated was an unforeseen consequence. Indeed, for years, FCC members stated they didn't want to reclassify Internet providers, but it seems like the court ruling gave them little other choice. Of course, the Internet providers will appeal this ruling, as well, and likely work with their supporters in Congress to get the laws changed.
In the meantime, the advocates of net neutrality mostly seem overjoyed with the ruling. But I worry that they, too, should be wary of unintended consequences.
Most advocates of net neutrality, including me, would also favor very little regulation on the Internet. But the simple act of reclassification means that the FCC is asserting it has the power to regulate the Internet in all sorts of ways, even if it is promising to forebear new regulations regarding pricing, taxes, and fees. There's no guarantee that future commissions won't change their minds. And while the First Amendment generally provides protection for speech in this country, there are those who argue that providers should block sites that support terrorist groups or that provide pornography. Once the FCC has the right to regulate the Internet, it's hard to draw a firm line.
One reason that net neutrality is so important is because we have so few options in broadband providers. While there are a few places with fiber connections available through Google or phone companies, (and the FCC also seems to be pushing for municipal broadband), most of us have only one place to get a high-speed broadband connection: our local cable companies. And in most cases, it was regulation that established the local cable monopolies in the first place.
Another consequence of tighter U.S. regulation of the Internet is that it will make it harder for the government to argue against further Internet regulations in other countries. Having a global Internet where everyone can talk to everyone, with relatively few rules, has been a huge benefit. I'm worried we're moving slowly towards a more fragmented Internet, with each country or region having its own set of rules.
I would have preferred a middle ground here, with Congress and the administration agreeing to laws that would have enabled the FCC to enforce net neutrality rules without reclassifying Internet service. It seems that it would have been a good time to look at the overall Telecommunications Act, which hasn't been updated since 1996, before most of today's Internet sites even existed and long before we had fast wireless data. But partisans on both sides dug in their heels to the point that no legislation could move forward. This led directly to yesterday's ruling, with the prospect for more appeals and regulations that could change dramatically depending on who controls the FCC. To both sides I say: be careful what you wish for. You may get it, and find the consequences aren't what you expect.
For more, check out 5 Things You Need to Know About the FCC's Net Neutrality Plan and the video below.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

3 planned to kill in U.S. if unable to join Islamic State, FBI says

from latimes



Three Brooklyn men arrested and charged with attempting to aid Islamic state
Two men were arrested Wednesday in New York as they allegedly prepared to join Islamic State militants in Syria, while a third man was arrested in Florida for allegedly helping fund their efforts, after they boasted of their plans on the Internet.
The three, all immigrants from Central Asia who live in Brooklyn, N.Y., allegedly plotted to launch attacks in this country if they were prevented from joining the extremist group, according to a criminal complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn.
------------
FOR THE RECORD
Feb. 25, 1:57 p.m.: An earlier version of this post incorrectly described the three men arrested as Uzbeks. Two are Uzbeks and one is a Kazakh.
------------
One of the men repeatedly offered to assassinate President Obama if ordered to do so by  Islamic State, according to the complaint.
Akhror Saidakhmetov, 19, a citizen of Kazakhstan, was arrested at John F. Kennedy International Airport as he attempted to board a flight to Istanbul, Turkey, and then travel to Syria, the FBI said.
In conversations secretly recorded by the FBI, Saidakhmetov allegedly said he might try to force the flight to divert “so that the Islamic State would gain a plane.”
He also allegedly said that if he failed to reach Syria, he was prepared to join the military to kill U.S. soldiers, plant a bomb on Coney Island, the beachfront entertainment area in Brooklyn, or shoot FBI agents and New York police.
“We will go and purchase one handgun … then go and shoot one police officer,” he said in one wiretapped call, according to the complaint.
“Boom… Then, we will take his gun, bullets and a bulletproof vest … then, we will do the same with a couple of others. Then we will go to the FBI headquarters, kill the FBI people.”
Also arrested was Abdurasul Hasanovich Juraboev, 24, a citizen of Uzbekistan. Authorities said he had purchased a ticket to Istanbul and planned to follow Saidakhmetov to Syria next month.
The third suspect, Abror Habibov, 30, also an Uzbek citizen, is accused of giving the two money to help them fly to Turkey to join Islamic State. Habibov, who owns a chain of kiosks in retail malls in several states, was arrested in Jacksonville, Fla.
About 20,000 foreign fighters have joined Islamic State and other Sunni militant groups in Syria and Iraq, including several thousand Europeans and about 100 Americans, according to U.S. estimates. About a dozen Americans are believed to be fighting on behalf of Islamic State.
According to the complaint, U.S. investigators first began tracking the men in August after Juraboev allegedly posted a note on a now-closed Uzbek-language website that sought recruits for Islamic State, offering to shoot Obama if the extremist group ordered him to do so.
“That will strike fear in the hearts of infidels,” the note states. Juraboev repeated his pledge to “execute Obama” in an email later that month to another Islamic State website, according to the complaint.
Special FBI Agent Ryan Singer wrote in the criminal complaint that agents first interviewed Juraboev in August and he openly discussed plans not only to join the Islamic State but also  to kill Obama.
The investigation spread to Saidakhmetov, and wiretaps were approved to pick up the two men’s conversations. The FBI also planted a paid confidential informant, who met and befriended Juraboev at a local mosque.
At one point Saidakhmetov offered to join the U.S. military so he could pass information to Islamic State “to help in their attacks,” according to the complaint. Barring that, he said, he “could always open fire on American soldiers and kill as many of them as possible.”
According to the criminal complaint, Saidakhmetov was overjoyed when his travel documents were cleared by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security last week. He opened the package and said “his soul was already on its way to paradise and made the sound of a horn.”
The three were each charged with attempt to provide and conspiracy to provide material support to Islamic State. If convicted, they each face up to 15 years in prison.
All three made initial appearances in court but did not yet enter pleas in the case.
Loretta Lynch, the U.S. attorney in Brooklyn and President’s Obama’s nominee to replace Eric H. Holder Jr. as attorney general, is overseeing the case. A Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote Thursday on her nomination.
Lynch said the case shows the U.S. efforts to stop people from joining Islamic State, as well as to stop people influenced by the group from using violence in this country.
“The flow of foreign fighters to Syria represents an evolving threat to our country and to our allies,” Lynch said in a statement. “Anyone who threatens our citizens and our allies, here or abroad, will face the full force of American justice.”
On Capitol Hill, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, announced a new congressional task force to strategize how to stop U.S. residents from becoming militants. “More must be done to keep them off the battlefield,” he said.
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said Wednesday’s arrests were “yet another reminder that even in the United States, [Islamic State] barbarism has found its adherents.”
At a news conference in Brooklyn, New York City Police Commissioner William J. Bratton said the case highlights Islamic State's reach on social media, and the group's ability to motivate sympathizers in the U.S. to act.
"This is real," he said. "This is the concern about the lone wolf, inspired to act without going to the Middle East."
Bratton made reference to 32-year-old Zale Thompson, a Queens resident who attacked four city police officers with a hatchet in a subway station last year. When officers scoured his computer after the assault, they found he had visited several websites sympathetic to Islamic State, Bratton said.
Asked why Juraboev wasn't arrested immediately after threatening to kill Obama, Diego Rodriguez, assistant director in charge of the FBI's New York field office, said agents chose to monitor him instead to obtain more information about his network.
Follow @RickSerranoLAT for news on the FBI and Justice Department and @JamesQueallyLAT for breaking news
Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

UPDATES

12:51 p.m.: This post has been updated with additional information from the criminal complaint and comments by New York City Police Commissioner William J. Bratton. 
The first version of this post published at 10:48 a.m.