Thursday, October 30, 2014

Top 10 Epic Reasons Why Americans Should Give a Sh*t About Voting

from truth-out



Thursday, 30 October 2014 00:00By Victoria Collier and Ben-Zion PtashnikTruthout | News Analysis


2014 1030 collier sw
"Casting a ballot never precludes more direct acts." (Image:#99MileMarch via Shutterstock)



Pop icon Russell Brand raised a ruckus last year when he exhorted, "Don't vote" to millions of his fans; a radical political directive under fire even by the likes of Sex Pistol Johnny Rotten.
But Brand was just preaching to the choir.
Many Americans, particularly the young, believe that voting is an exercise in futility, or worse, an immoral display of support for a fundamentally corrupt political system. Far more appealing is to build a diverse grassroots movement - organically and horizontally - to change our consciousness, our lifestyles, the way we grow our food, harness our energy, travel, trade - and how we treat each other as human beings.
In other words, direct action to the change the world, starting with ourselves and our communities, seems more viable than investing hope in a political apparatus sold out to big money corporate interests on both sides of the aisle.
But not everyone feels this way. Some see our current dire situation as more of a yes, and opportunity, as in: Yes, we should do all of the above - radically change ourselves, radically change the world, and radically engage in the political process.
Casting a ballot never precludes more direct acts - that's just a cop-out. The fact is that not every societal change is made at the personal level, or through revolution on the streets. That's why millions before us, most recently African Americans andwomen, have protested, fought, were imprisoned, set upon by police dogs, lynched, force-fed in hunger strikes, and killed for the right to cast a ballot. And even so, millions of former felons will still be disenfranchised in the coming elections, as will those who lack proper ID (thanks to a slew of new discriminatory laws pushed by the right wing to suppress minority voters).
2014 1030 collier 3Force feeding suffragette, 1912. (Image: The Illustrated London News)
Meanwhile, thousands of students in Hong Kong's Umbrella Revolution are putting their bodies on the line right now to demand true suffrage, standing up to the Chinese Communist oligarchy that murdered democratic activists in Tiananmen Square. Those youth are fighting for control of their future by demanding democracy and refusing to back down.
2014 1030 collier 1Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, October 7, 2014. (Photo: Pasu Au Yeung)

Cynical political abandonment allows the wrong people to control our government and decide whether climate mitigation is a national priority, or a "liberal conspiracy."

In a candid moment that he may live to regret, Hong Kong's Beijing-appointed political leader Leung, who lives in a palatial mansion, stated that China could not allow the majority of the citizens of Hong Kong to rule, because doing so might allow the working poor people a potentially dominant role in running their own lives.
In light of all this, Russell Brand's call to toss aside what so many still mightily struggle and suffer to win, seems disrespectful, in the kindest light. 
If we have a future (and granted, this is debatable), we all have to Occupy Democracy. We need to Occupy Elections, Occupy Legislatures and Occupy Local town and City Councils. The concept of Occupation has been central to many movements over the past century. Occupying means you are bringing your conscious intention and fierce dedication to change the system to reflect your values.
In a recent article, Carl Gibson of US Uncut points to the high standard and sanity of living in Denmark, a country where 87 percent of voters turn out. That public showing could account for practically all educational institutes in Denmark being free as well as a truly "living" minimum wage of $21 an hour.
For those of you still on the fence, here are 10 pretty epic reasons to vote this November - and to prepare to get active in the critical battles to come in 2016.
1. Climate Change
As Naomi Klein and 400,000 protesters in NYC recently pointed out, climate change is forcing a time of reckoning upon our capitalist culture of excess. While everyone will have to make profound personal lifestyle changes to help balance our ecological books, many of the big transitions to sustainable energy and development must happen at the state and federal levels. And it will take an enormous amount of political activism, cooperation and vision to move the agenda.
Cynical political abandonment allows the wrong people to control our government and decide whether climate mitigation is a national priority, or a "liberal conspiracy."
So, after taking the Climate Mobilization Pledge, as we solar-panel our roofs, relearn the wonders of riding a bike, cut carbon-intensive meat from our diet and considerestablishing an eco-village with our friends, we can also get involved in supporting the candidates who are committed to taking meaningful action. Tremendous government investment and war-time mobilization is needed to make the transition away from the climate cliff.
We must Occupy the streets and the political process at every turn, to change laws that disallow for a sustainable society: from international trade agreements to local policy banning front yard vegetable gardens and keeping a few goats and chickens.

How, in poetic essence, are they going to pull the stake from the heart of democracy driven in by the Citizens United Supreme Court decision?

So yes, your active political participation and your vote will help determine whether humanity builds a green bridge across the abyss, or rides an oil-funded warhead into oblivion.
2. The Koch Brothers.
These two guys are the fossil fuel, petro-chemical kings of our dirty and self-destructive economy. They're worth $43 billion and deeply invested in thwarting a less carbon-intensive, more just society. To that end, they're spending some of their pocket change (a few billion or so), and using their pay-to-play operation ALEC, to control our political process: buy candidates andcampaign ads, fund climate-change denier propaganda, install anti-democratic puppets in office, dismantle unions and kill state legislation promoting renewable energy and other green incentives.
Voting overwhelmingly for candidates who are not funded by the Kochs will knock back these arrogant oligarch's attempt to simply buy our country and our future.
3. Right-Wing Fascist Take-Over
Whether you "believe" in voting or not, the fascists will take over if we don't stop them at the ballot box. Once they take over, history proves it's really hard to get them out of power without a war in the streets.
While there are a lot of corporatist sell-outs on the Democrat's side of the aisle (called Blue Dogs, or Democrats in Name Only), most of them aren't actually fascists. The right-wing extremists, however, have strong fascist leanings. Like a mob of thugs, they will viciously attack women's rights, gay rights, voting rights, workers rights, immigrant rights, civil rights, environmental protections, push for more oppressive policing - and for more war.

The future of our precious internet can't be decided by lifestyle choices.

Some far-right-wingers believe "legitimate rape" doesn't cause pregnancy. Others are unabashed religious fundamentalists who actually believe America should submit toDominionist Theocracy.
We can't just close our eyes and make these people go away. Ceding the political battleground to them is suicidal.
4. Democrats in Name Only (DINOs)
We just mentioned these guys. They pretend to support the more progressive platform points of the Democratic Party, but they're really just power brokers who consistently sell us out.
In most races - and always in the presidential race - we lack a viable third party. This is due to ballot access rules thwarting grassroots participation, unequal media coverage and voting systems that ensure the dreaded spoiler effect. Sadly, a lot of progressives Democrats today can only hold their noses and vote for these DINOs, hoping for the lesser of two weevils.
But where truly progressive candidates are running in the Democratic primaries, voting becomes a revolutionary act.
We can effectively challenge DINOs in the 2016 primaries when we support populist and progressive candidates rising up from the grassroots and essentially Occupying the Democrats. They  need  us to help in their campaigns and to show up at the ballot box.
Here are some resources to find and support better candidates: DemocracyforAmerica.com. Progressive Democrats of America.

Big decisions on government accountability to citizen rights are made bygovernment.

Or vote for Green Party and Progressive Partycandidates wherever they exist, especially if they are opposed to a DINO.
5. The Internet - Free and Fair or Co-Opted and Controlled?
The future of our precious internet can't be decided by lifestyle choices. FCC rules are going to determine whether the web remains a truly revolutionary democratic "free market" of products and ideas, or is transformed into a virtual Big Box strip mall of bad zoning laws, Big Brother censorship and unfair advantages for the already powerful.
We still have time to help prevent this by promoting and voting for candidates who support Net Neutrality.
6. Civil Rights, Electronic Privacy, NSA and the Dystopian Nightmare Future
Most of us are now hooked in and wholly dependent on global electronic networks for our livelihoods, communications, commerce, credit and travel. And, as Edward Snowden's revelations recently unveiled, they are all fully infiltrated by an unaccountable shadowy spy network. These corporate/government/military "national security" spooks and unelected bureaucracies direct policy and pull the strings on government in every administration.

Issues that affect our most personal, intimate lives often get decided in public referendums or ballot initiatives.

Meanwhile, as the definition of "domestic terrorist" is mission-creeping to include potentially anyone deemed an enemy of the state, activist groups are infiltrated and their electronic communications monitored and sabotaged.
This isn't democracy, it isn't the future we want, and again, it isn't something we can control with our wallet or by being nicer people.
Big decisions on government accountability to citizen rights are made bygovernment. That's why we need - we need - to find and support candidates who will commit to turning our techno-culture away from the dystopian nightmare sci-fi flick we're becoming.
If we can't find enough of those candidates, we may need to become those candidates.
7. Gay Rights, Marijuana Legalization, GMO Labeling, etc.
These and other issues that affect our most personal, intimate lives often get decided in public referendums or ballot initiatives - forms of direct democracy. Opposition forces and mega-corporations like Monsanto, are deeply threatened by this grassroots process that does an end-run around their puppets in government.
So, as unfolding in Colorado right now, they spend millions to flood the airwaves with propaganda prior to the vote; deceptive ad campaigns that generate enough fear to drive a lot of angry, paranoid and confused people to the polls.
If we stay home, we often lose by tragically narrow margins.
8. War
All our antiwar protests fall on deaf ears in government, if the ears belong to a bunch of war hawks, spoiling to hand lucrative contracts to their weapon-contractor buddies, or the guys who get rich building military bases and then rebuilding the cities they've bombed into ashes.

We can choose to vote for antiwar candidates, when we can find them, and to force all candidates to answer the question of how they will undo the Constitutional damage of the past 13 years.

War is big business, they say, and war is a racket. But war is also a staggering waste of our resources, an environmental catastrophe, and an unconscionable human rights violation. Yet the United States, post 9/11, is in a state of permanent war. The War on Terror has been used to undermine our Constitutional rights, to keep secret "black site" prisons, to torture, and to drone-strike "terrorists" at will, including innocent people, and children, and babies.
War should have no place in our future. This is our choice.
We can choose to vote for antiwar candidates, when we can find them, and to force all candidates to answer the question of how they will undo the Constitutional damage of the past 13 years (the PATRIOT Act, the Military Commissions Act, Guantanamo Bay and others) and change the course of the future toward peace.
Any candidate who can't, or won't answer those questions, is not qualified to lead or deserving of our vote.
9. Corporatocracy and Corruption vs. Democracy and Transparency
Why are we increasingly losing faith in democracy - which is essentially losing faith in ourselves? It's because democracy itself - its very bones and sinews - are being dismantled and unraveled by anti-government forces within government. A lot of wealthy wolves-in-sheep's-clothing have wormed their way into office in recent decades (sometimes through rigging elections) to undermine government because they actually don't believe in democracy. 
They fear it.
Government, when it works, can truly serve the people who comprise the body politic, protect us against exploitation and abuses, set rules and regulations that rein in the excesses of capitalism, prevent ecological destruction, provide justice for minority groups, education, and investment that reflect our deeper values.
And so, another question that must be lit like a grassfire under the asses of all serious candidates, is: How they are going to reverse the corruption that has obscured democracy?
How, in poetic essence, are they going to pull the stake from the heart of democracy driven in by the Citizens United Supreme Court decision; by "corporate personhood,"by the shameful lack of support for public campaign financing; by unjust electoral rules, and by corporate lobbyists outright buying our representatives?
When these questions are made a top priority, and all candidates must answer, we will begin to wake up to what real democracy looks like. We will begin to heal, as people, as citizens.
In other words, we will actually begin a peaceful, powerful and intelligent democratic revolution.
10. The Banksters, Corporate Welfare, Emergency Management and TRILLIONS in Looted Cash and Public Assets
We have a critical economic situation reaching a tipping point, and your vote can help turn the tide.
You probably remember when the criminals on Wall Street crashed the economy in 2008 and screwed millions of Americans out of their homes and savings? Well, the inaction of both major political parties in enacting economic reform has been brewing popular discontent, even among conservatives.
We've endured decades of "trickle-down" (or -on) voodoo economics, mass outsourcing, corporate-plunder free trade agreements, rising education costs, exploitative school loans, and now Chicago School austerity measures, cutting domestic programs and services. This collective self-abuse has created an entire generation of young Americans with crippling debt and few employment prospects, far too many abusing prescription drugs amid crumbling cities and infrastructure. What a stupid, pointless waste of our potential, all so the filthy rich could get filthier.
Meanwhile corporate welfare and the rampant tax evasion of the 1% funnels trillions - yes, trillions - out of our tax base. As we bleed to death, fat and happy millionaire Ayn Rand acolytes in government crow that America is "broke" - and of course, blame the beleaguered working class and the poor.
The next phase in this orgy of deception and national looting is "Corporate Emergency Management" as seen in Detroit, where cities (usually minority) have their democratic government suspended and are forced into bankruptcy so their assets - including pensions - can be siphoned off to private interests.
If all this bothers you - and it really should bother you - one way to fight it is to vote for candidates who are not slavish whores to Wall Street banks, who are courageous and moral enough to hold the corrupt architects of poverty and false austerity accountable.
Key reforms should include closing all corporate welfare loopholes, and a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) on Wall Street as a way to regain the lost revenue and looted assets. We must make taxing Wall Street part of the new paradigm of economic reform, not austerity. We know they have robbed us blind - lets get out the smart policy pitchforks and start fighting back.
11., 12., 13.  . . . Add your issue here and keep going
Voting - or not voting - in some way impacts almost every aspect of our lives, including whom we can love.
Your body, your food, your air and water. The working conditions you enjoy or despise, the racism and violence of your local police force, the political agenda of judges, health care, homelessness, education, product safety, minimum wage, gun laws, public transportation, emergency preparedness, traffic lights, pot holes, school lunches, day care, birth control, and every possible environmental, civil and human rights protection you can imagine.
CAUTION: If you decide to vote this year . . . Beware the stolen election.
Yes, it's true. In the end, there's currently a very strong possibility your ballot could be lost or stolen through vote rigging. This, too, is something we need to fix together.
America's voting system has been privatized, sold off to a handful of shady companies, some with criminal histories. Most of our votes are now counted in secret by their easily rigged and hacked "trade secret" computer software.
Paradoxically, this crazy-making subversion of democracy is actually why we all need to get out and vote. It's much more difficult to manipulate votes by large margins. Low turn-out and lack of public interest helps criminals steal elections.

It's much more difficult to manipulate votes by large margins. Low turn-out and lack of public interest helps criminals steal elections.

If you're planning to vote by absentee ballot, by mail, or in early voting, - all of which provide marvelous convenience - understand that these systems have a downside. Without full oversight of those ballots, they make easy pickings for election rigging.
Cast your ballot in person on Election Day if at all possible.
The only way to achieve full oversight of the voting process is to cast voter-marked paper ballots and count them by hand on election night, at the voting precinct, before they are moved to a central tabulating location. The UN has called this the "Gold Standard" of democratic elections. The trouble is, a lot of our computerized voting machines don't even produce a paper ballot, so we can't count, recount or audit the election.
The powers that be will not restore integrity to our voting systems unless we force them to do so. To become a grassroots Election Integrity activist, learn how to count ballots yourself (fun!), and fight for a fully transparent vote count in 2016.
Occupy the Future
As we radically re-envision our world, and our future - imagining green cities, clean energy, free education, local sustainable commerce, just laws, celebrations of diversity, an end to war - we must include a renewal of democracy in our plans: Our vision will not survive under fascism. It will be crushed.
We have to fight on every level to take back the public sphere that's been stolen from us, mangled and mutilated by corruption, privatized and sold off to the highest corporate bidder.
Democratic elections must be part of the central commons we build together. To change everything, we need everyone.
Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.

VICTORIA COLLIER AND BEN-ZION PTASHNIK

Victoria Collier is a writer, election integrity advocate, organic grower, and activist in environmental and social justice movements. She is the editor of Votescam and Democracy Movement.
Ben-Zion Ptashnik is a former Vermont State Senator, and a lifelong human rights advocate, environmental activist, and community organizer.
They both live off-the grid with solar and wind power, in a permaculture community on an organic farm and orchard, where they also run a solar energy company.
They are the co-founders and Directors of the National Election Integrity Coalition:Democracy Movement




Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Rise of the American police state: 9 disgraceful events that paved the way


From the War on Drugs to the militarization of police, these deeply unsettling milestones got us where we are




This article originally appeared on AlterNet.
AlterNetThe August 19 shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and the protests that followed have focused attention on the militarization of police in the United States. Police overreach, especially in African-American neighborhoods, is nothing new: it was Marquette Frye’s confrontation with California Highway Patrol officers on Aug. 11, 1965, that sparked the  Watts Riots in Los Angeles almost half a century ago. But much has changed since the 1960s and 1970s: American police are a lot more militarized than they were back then, and many of the checks and balances that made the U.S. a democratic republic have been eroded by both courts and politicians. Here are 10 events of recent decades that have encouraged the growth of a police state in the U.S. and promoted the type of toxic environment in which unarmed Brown was shot six times.
1. Ronald Reagan Escalates the War on Drugs
Although the war on drugs started under President Richard Nixon and continued under the administrations of Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter, it was expanded considerably during Ronald Reagan’s two terms as president. Reagan proved to be much more draconian than Nixon, aggressively promoting militarized no-knock drug raids, asset forfeiture laws and mandatory minimum sentences, especially for crack cocaine. The drug war has greatly increased the prison population and placed a heavy burden on taxpayers, as well as imperiled many innocent Americans. Since the 1980s, there have been countless examples of narcotics officers targeting the wrong house or apartment for a no-knock SWAT raid, brandishing assault weapons and  killing or injuring innocent people who had nothing to do with drugs. And when that happens, the officers hardly ever face incarceration or even civil charges.
2. Rodney King Beating of 1991


Saturday, October 25, 2014

Vladimir Putin’s war on gays

from thehill.com





 17
During the Cold War, the Soviet Union persecuted leading dissidents, who sought to change Soviet society, and Jews, who simply wanted to emigrate to Israel but were forbidden to leave.  They were threatened and intimidated by the KGB, and imprisoned or sent to Siberia after show trials.   The American government constantly condemned Soviet human rights abuses (especially during the Reagan Administration), made favorable trade status for the Soviet Union contingent on allowing Jews to leave, and imposed a basket of human rights obligations on the Soviet Union as part of the Helsinki Accords that ratified the post-World War II borders of Europe.   Ultimately, the confrontational approach worked.   The Soviet Jews were allowed to emigrate, the harsh treatment of dissidents eased, and eventually the Soviet Union collapsed.
Whether we are engaged in a new Cold War with Russia is a matter of ongoing debate.   What is not debatable is the Soviet style-violation of human rights in Vladimir Putin’s Russia, except that the victims this time are not dissidents and Jews but gays.   And, other than during the run-up to the Sochi Olympics earlier this year, the Obama administration, and other western governments, have not consistently criticized these Russian human rights violations.      
One recent example occurred earlier this month when Russia abruptly cancelled its participation in the U.S. government’s long standing Future Leaders Exchange (FLEX).  This program brings 8,000 Russian high school students to the United States for a school year(American students do not go to Russia).   Russian authorities justified the cancellation on the ground that a 17 year old male Russian FLEX student elected to stay in the United States and apply for political asylum because of his sexual orientation.    Yet, the Obama Administration downplayed it, misleadingly suggesting that the cancellation was simply another pretext by Russia to damage ties with the United States.    In fact, it was the result of Vladimir Putin’s severe homophobia and his constant emphasis on the moral corruption of the West (and Russia’s moral superiority).   The Administration blew an opportunity to call attention to Russia’s oppression of a vulnerable minority.
Putin’s Russia is one of the most viciously anti-gay countries in the world even though homosexuality was legalized two decades ago.   Prior to Putin’s re-election in 2012, the hate campaign against gays was typically carried out by lower-level officials.   The then mayor of Moscow described gay events as “Satanic” and one regional governor suggested that “faggots should be torn apart and their pieces thrown in the wind.”
After Putin’s re-election, the war against gays went national and, literally, viral on the internet.   In October 2013, a Russian lawmaker introduced legislation in the Russian Parliament to forcibly remove children from the homes of their gay or lesbian parents on the ground that “nontraditional sexual orientation” was equivalent to child abuse.   In the face of international condemnation and the pending Sochi Winter Olympics, the bill was withdrawn.  But a law is on the books forbidding "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations" among minors and is so broadly worded that Russian gay parents are frightened that they still will lose their children.   Another law was passed forbidding adoption of Russian-born children by foreign gay couples or individuals living in countries that recognize same sex marriage.  Yet another law was enacted that classifies “homosexual propaganda” as pornography.
Russian gays who protested these laws were beaten by hoodlums while the police stood by, which Amnesty International termed “state sanctioned violence and discrimination.”    According to Tatiana Vinnichenko, the director of Rakurs, a Russian LGBT rights organization, the authorities are putting pressure on banks, landlords, and employers not to do business with LGBT organizations or individuals.    
In Russia, the internet is used to incite hatred against gays.   As shown in HBO’s documentary,Hunted: The War Against Gays in Russia, which just premiered in the United States, a vigilante organization called Occupy Pedophilia films its members humiliating, beating and torturing gays and then posts the films online (in one scene, a female ringleader of an Occupy group, laughing at the prospect of trapping a gay man, says “we’ll destroy his life as usual.”)   Occupy Pedophilia is not a fringe sect; it has branches in 30 Russian cities and its thugs have essentially been given free rein by authorities to go on a rampage against gays.   Since Putin’s re-election, over 5,000 people have been arrested in more than 200 protests over anti-gay laws, but members of  Occupy Pedophilia are rarely prosecuted, let alone convicted, even though their faces are plainly visible in the films.
Vladimir Putin is the “homophobe in chief,”  according to Vinnichenko.  Indeed, Putin defends the anti-gay adoption and propaganda laws by equating gays with pedophiles, which Occupy Pedophilia likewise professes to be the reason it assaults gays.   Putin also blames Russia’s problems on gays, saying that Russia needs to "cleanse" itself of homosexuality if it wants to increase its birth rate.    Putin’s remark sounds chillingly similar to ethnic cleansing, considered by international law experts to be a form of genocide.  
Prior to the Sochi Winter Olympics, President Obama and many celebrities and athletes, from Lady Gaga to NBA player and gay athlete John Hamachi, condemnedRussia’s repression of gays.   But, when the Olympics ended, and with crises emerging from the Ukraine to ISIS, focus has been lost.   As we learned in the Cold War, effective opposition to human rights abuses, especially in Russia, is a full-time commitment.    The tepid response of the Obama Administration to Russia’s homophobic tantrum over one gay exchange student is not the way to do it.
Wallance is a lawyer and writer in New York City and a former federal prosecutor. 

TLC's 'Honey Boo Boo' Cancellation Shows Dangers Of Exploitative TV

from npr



June "Mama June" Shannon jokes with daughter Alana "Honey Boo Boo" Thompson, star of TLC's unscripted series Here Comes Honey Boo Boo.
June "Mama June" Shannon jokes with daughter Alana "Honey Boo Boo" Thompson, star of TLC's unscripted seriesHere Comes Honey Boo Boo.
John Bazemore/AP
It's easy to slip into gloating mode, now that cable channel TLC has finally canceled a show so many of us critics have hated for so long: Here Comes Honey Boo Boo.
Unfortunately, the cancellation comes following a horrifying moment: Gossip site TMZreported Thursday that June "Mama June" Shannon, the mother of child beauty pageant contestant Alana "Honey Boo Boo" Thompson, has resumed dating an old boyfriend who was convicted of molesting an 8-year-old related to Shannon.
Shannon has denied the allegations, saying in a video on her Facebook page that "I have not seen that person in 10 years." But TMZ posted a photo it says depicts Shannon and the man, 53-year-old Mark McDaniel, recently hanging out with friends in a hotel room.
TLC on Friday issued a statement without addressing the allegations directly: "TLC has cancelled the series HERE COMES HONEY BOO BOO and ended all activities around the series, effective immediately. Supporting the health and welfare of these remarkable children is our only priority. TLC is faithfully committed to the children's ongoing comfort and well-being."
This is where you would typically insert lots of commentary referencing early questions of whether the show exploits its young star (it was developed as a spinoff of the child beauty pageant series Toddlers and Tiaras). Or you could note how such "hicksploitation TV" shows stereotype rural, Southern families with little regard for the impact of turning their lives into national punch lines.
And you could comment on how all the justifications from Mama June insisting participation in the show wouldn't seriously damage her daughter — echoed by TLC as it raked in the ratings, of course — feels bitterly hollow now.
But this is something we've seen in a less alarming way before. When Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson let his inner homophobe fly in a GQ magazine interview, A&E suspended him, then unsuspended him and saw ratings plummet nearly 50 percent from the show's heights.
Bravo's Real Housewives franchise just saw two of its stars, Joe and Teresa Giudice, sent to prison on conspiracy and bankruptcy fraud charges, leading some critics to wonder whether such activities were connected to maintaining the wealthy lifestyle showcased on the program. (Bravo, of course, turned a post-sentencing interview into a TV special.)
Too often, it seems reality TV producers have been in the business of handing worldwide platforms to dubious people in questionable circumstances. They shrug off criticisms of their high-wire TV acts and cross their fingers, hopeful that their "stars" won't implode until — like the bitter divorce between Jon and Kate Plus 8 stars Jon and Kate Gosselin — their shows are already in decline. (Honey Boo Boo's recent ratings have also been lower than previous highs.)
According to TMZ, TLC has a season's worth of Honey Boo Boo episodes it is shelving. But the website also reported that Shannon was sneaking off during filming to spend time with McDaniel, raising questions about what the cable channel knew and whether it should have called off the series before allegations about this relationship were made public.
Often, the consequences for creating these kinds of shows TV shows can seem ephemeral and academic. But even if Shannon's denials about dating McDaniel are true, the entire episode has become national news in the most brutal way — possibly leaving vulnerable children and a fractured family in its wake.
Wonder if anyone will think of this when the next exploitative TV concept comes up?